![]() |
Were Enfield bayos ever this odd? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
Shamu
Senior Member
Joined: 25 April 2007 Location: MD, USA. Online Status: Offline Posts: 1198 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Were Enfield bayos ever this odd?Posted: 15 January 2010 at 2:33pm |
|
|
Or did "Bubba" help?
"Bubba" is an interesting charecter & has come up with some interesting "TFMs" but this may be a winner.
I don't have a picture & I'm not a collector, so I'm not a big (or small, even) expert in bayonets, so please excuse me if my terminology is "off".
Was there ever, anywhere, a version of a Lee-Enfield bayonet that was made by cutting the pointy end of a spike bayonet off, & welding (or brazing) the stub to the back of the handle of a #1 type batonet's handle tang?
I ask because I've been offered locally this "Rare! Unique!" Enfield bayonet.
It looks like a handled bayonet, with a #4 type stub attached to the back of it.
|
||
|
You can't hit it if you can't see it!
|
||
![]() |
||
Tony
Moderator Group
Moderator Joined: 18 April 2006 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2251 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2010 at 5:40pm |
|
|
Thats either a wind up or a classic attempt at fraud! If any more turn up you'll probably find some old guy in a shed at the bottom of his garden with a Mig welder.
|
||
|
Tony
Do Muslims have Piggy banks? Born free taxed to death!!! Semper im Faecebus sumus sole profundum variat |
||
![]() |
||
Shamu
Senior Member
Joined: 25 April 2007 Location: MD, USA. Online Status: Offline Posts: 1198 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2010 at 8:27am |
|
|
That's kind of what I figgured.
My one preference for the No1 rifles would be that they take a bayonet you can actually use to open a can of corned beef with.
|
||
|
You can't hit it if you can't see it!
|
||
![]() |
||
LE Owner
Senior Member
Joined: 04 December 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2010 at 1:23pm |
|
They used a mix of No.1 rifles for close ups and No.4 rifles fitted with the 1907 style bayonets for troops in the back ground.
Also in any close ups where troops were supposedly firing only the rear portion of the modified No.4 rifles were seen.
I suspect that most if not all the No.1 rifles used in the film were either cast resin dummy rifles or welded up de activated rifles. They used the No.4 rifles for firing close ups because the actions of those still cycled.
They were just dry firing from the look of it, muzzle blasts being added with CGI.
Check for any markings that would indicate a film prop warehouse. Motion picture props often get sold off or ripped off, and can bring a good price if they bear markings or have accompanying letters for provenance.
|
||
![]() |
||
A square 10
Senior Member
Joined: 12 December 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1346 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 6:59am |
|
|
before you dismiss this out-of-hand , please note that there were such a thing ,
it was an experimental bayonet , it was developed in the late 30s , it was intended for the '.276 special [sniper] rifle' , the first of these proposed designs was a cruciform style #B263 [25.1.1939]with a 16+" spike , a later version with a P07 style #B264 blade went thru four types "A"-"D" , they differ in that the first two were weld-ons the second two were screw fastened , reuseing existing P07 blades , and they had varrying offsets of the blade from the bore axis ,
the type "A" was set at same offset dimension as the accepted no4 mkI to the no4 rifle , type "B" was set to the offset of the P07 to the no1 rifle , the type "C" was the offset of the no4 with three screws fastening a salvaged P07 blade and the type "D" used four screws and a tiny bit more offset , all were 16+" blades ,
there are questions as to wether all of these were actually produced or if some were only concept drawings , but some of at least a couple were , and obviously the first , in a shortened version becam the no4 bayonet , the blades would have taken more resources at a time when there were too few available to meet even the minimal demands , thus ..............
these were abandoned at outbreak of the war for simpler and shorter spike versions due to production constraints ,
|
||
![]() |
||
Shamu
Senior Member
Joined: 25 April 2007 Location: MD, USA. Online Status: Offline Posts: 1198 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 9:05am |
|
|
So this might be a real item then?
Hmmmm.
I'm guessing if it is real it'd be a type "B" if I'm reading this correctly. Blade bayonet, not spike & offset more than normal (almost double in fact, a #4 + a #1 offset) and welded/brazed in place. Could this be a real reare collectable maybe?
|
||
|
You can't hit it if you can't see it!
|
||
![]() |
||
LE Owner
Senior Member
Joined: 04 December 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 12:41pm |
|
I've seen No.4 Bayonets with a short blade rather than a spike, but these had no handle.
The Film prop bayonets looked to be a 1907 Bayonet fitted to a No.4 socket, the ring fitted over the cut off stub of the No.4 spike. The upper band and its screw may have also been used in some manner to secure the handle.
I'd wondered whether this was some third world modification to use available old stock P1907 bayonets, but the lash up is obviosly too flimsey to hold up in battle.
The purpose these were used for in the film was solely to give the impression that troops coming out of the trenches in the background were armed with the same model of rifle as the troops in the foreground.
With insurance costs of filming a battle scene and the high cost of rentals, as much as $400 a day for SMGs I'm told, prop providers use whatever is on hand, and don't wish to use rifles that haven't been deactivated. Finding hundreds of otherwise good condition WW1 era, or Lithgow WW2 era rifles might not have been easy, so available No.4 rifles fitted with the altered bayonets was a viable solution.
Its been awhile since I saw this film, but its likely to be shown again in the near future.
I think it was on the Discovery Channel in their "Battlefield Detectives" series. Probably dealing with the Somme.
|
||
![]() |
||
Shamu
Senior Member
Joined: 25 April 2007 Location: MD, USA. Online Status: Offline Posts: 1198 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 1:05pm |
|
|
Anyone have a pic, I don't.
Unfortunately it's not mine so I can't just grab it & take pics, unless I buy it first.
Markings? Yeah but again they are on the bayo & I don't have it handy.
The blade seemed to be the same (or at least really similar) in length to a regular Enfield bayonet for a #4, but they had a handle like a bayonet for a #1. The "stub" of what looked like a standard #4 spike bayonet went 60~70% of the length of the handle's tang.
The blade was a different shape from most #4 bayonets I've seen, but the length did not seem different from memory. The blade was "bowie-shaped" for lack of a better term.
I don't know if this helps any but there was a ring at the front of the handle, quite large IIRC. I assume the bullets would just pass thru the hole without contacting the rim
|
||
|
You can't hit it if you can't see it!
|
||
![]() |
||
A square 10
Senior Member
Joined: 12 December 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1346 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 1:11pm |
|
|
i did not clearly read it to include the grip after modification , if it does then you would be correct , it was most likely a prop or third world inovation of some sort ,
if the grip and crossguard are gone , the finished item would closely resemble a no9 - only with the P07 blade rater than the no5 blade [BTW there was a version of these with a M16 type blade as well] this would be what the experimental uniots looked like , long blade with a no4 socket no grip ,
it would be a rare one indeed tho as im not sure how many of the experimentals were made nor if any survived ,
|
||
![]() |
||
LE Owner
Senior Member
Joined: 04 December 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 2:04pm |
|
The Bowie bladed No.4 bayonets i have seen had no handle other than the socket fixture, useless for holding the blade as you would a fighting knife.
This may not have been meant for use on a rifle at all, or at least not on an Enfield, but rather a lashup to allow fitting a bayonet to another type of weapon entirely.
It could be some sort of experimental blade but nothing I've heard of before.
PS
This might be it, the No.7 bayonet for the STEN gun.
|
||
![]() |
||
Shamu
Senior Member
Joined: 25 April 2007 Location: MD, USA. Online Status: Offline Posts: 1198 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 4:32pm |
|
|
This may not have been meant for use on a rifle at all, or at least not on an Enfield, but rather a lashup to allow fitting a bayonet to another type of weapon entirely.
Actually the only thing I can think this would have been made for would be to fit on an enfield #4 with it's fitting round the barrel. Otherwise why bodge up a perfectly functional bayonet for a #1 rifle by welding the butt end of a bayonet for a #4 to it?
It certainly doesn't help when using the bayonet for anything else.
The link is darn close to what I saw
Could it be some oddball sten bayonet?
|
||
|
You can't hit it if you can't see it!
|
||
![]() |
||
LE Owner
Senior Member
Joined: 04 December 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 4:52pm |
|
Another article on this type bayonet said that it had been discontinued after an accident caused by a bullet striking the ring. It was then relegated to use in ceremony or parade.
Could be that accident was due to the ring not being rotated fully out of the way and latched.
Either way it seems to be a cumbersome bayonet, and not very efficient if used on a rifle.
|
||
![]() |
||
A square 10
Senior Member
Joined: 12 December 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1346 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 9:24pm |
|
|
"...........
Actually the only thing I can think this would have been made for would be to fit on an enfield #4 with it's fitting round the barrel. Otherwise why bodge up a perfectly functional bayonet for a #1 rifle by welding the butt end of a bayonet for a #4 to it?
It certainly doesn't help when using the bayonet for anything else.
The link is darn close to what I saw
Could it be some oddball sten bayonet?
........."
NOPE - i think it was the prop that was discussed , if it looks at all like a no7 bayo then the 'handle" is still there and its not the experimental that looked like a no9 ,
sorry - i keep wanting some common person to find a really rare bit , something that the 'real collectors' have not found yet , but then ive considered attacking a windmill or pi$$ing up a rope recently as well ...........guess im getting old |
||
![]() |
||
LE Owner
Senior Member
Joined: 04 December 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 10:38pm |
|
These were used only to give a No.4 rifle the same appearance as a SMLE when seen at a distance in the background.
The welded up No.7 clone may also be a film prop for that matter, but I suspect it was cobbled together to take the place of the No.7 bayonet for other reasons, possibly for training since the original No.7 was very likely prone to wear or damage.
Sort of like the German "Ersatz bayonet".
Thinking on it I may have seen a No.7 bayonet at the surplus store I mentioned on another thread, they'd sold out of the P1907 bayonets but had a few bayonets in a glass case of types I'd never seen and didn't recognize as being for an Enfield. I'll check those out next time I visit the store, the half price sale is still going on there.
|
||
![]() |
||
Shamu
Senior Member
Joined: 25 April 2007 Location: MD, USA. Online Status: Offline Posts: 1198 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2010 at 6:31am |
|
|
Ok, thanks guys.
It looks like it's really just a bubba job. No problem It kind of felt that way right from the beginning. I'll pass on getting whatever bodge this was. Like I said, I'm not really a collectorof bayonets anyway so it's no big deal for me.
|
||
|
You can't hit it if you can't see it!
|
||
![]() |
||
A square 10
Senior Member
Joined: 12 December 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1346 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2010 at 2:50pm |
|
|
the more ive reread this thread the more confused ive become , but , im going to pull my book out and look again ........
meantime heres real ones for the no4 -
![]() im waiting for delivery of a second #7 , not sure why i bought it , i guess i thought i needed some tradeing stock ........
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |