![]() |
Enfield ideations |
Post Reply
|
| Author | ||||||||
VAnimrod
Senior Member
Joined: December 21 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 291 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Enfield ideationsPosted: December 25 2008 at 10:05pm |
|||||||
|
I'm curious about a couple options re: Enfield customizations.
Consider this just the type of stuff that rattles through a rifle loony's head on a 700 mile road trip..... Anyway, could a standard SMLE be converted to Russian 7.62x54R with just a simple rechamber job? And, could one take a No.4MkI/II and convert to the .473" bolt face family via a rebarrel, and installation of an Ishapore magazine and bolt head (or just an Ishapore extractor)? |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
SW28fan
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: July 02 2007 Location: Texas Status: Online Points: 3389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 25 2008 at 10:20pm |
|||||||
|
The 303 to 7.62x54R conversion has been done the only issue is 7.62x54R usues .310" bullets were as must 303s have a .312 groove diameter. It works in some rifle and accuracy is poor in others.
The were a number of No4 that were converted to 7.62 Nato by the British Government after they adopted the FN, THe new modele was called the L-8 and there were several variations. The bolt head are out there a bit tricky to find as are 7.62 nato no4 magazines.
|
||||||||
|
Have a Nice Day
If already having a nice day please disregard |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Richard/SIA
Senior Member
Joined: February 02 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 387 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 26 2008 at 3:45am |
|||||||
Many guns will also require that the receiver is opened up to allow the larger 54r case head to pass into the chamber. |
||||||||
|
At over $3.00 a gallon for gas, I want it leaded, 100 octane, and my windshield washed!
|
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Tony
Moderator Group
Moderator Joined: April 18 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3256 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 26 2008 at 12:45pm |
|||||||
|
There is also a pressure issue! The 762x54 has a much higher pressure than the standard NATO 762 round and the enfield just isn't up to taking the pasting the russian rounds dish out. My lad has a Dragurnov sniper rifle in 762x54 and the loading data is the same as the 308 winchester not 762 NATO.
|
||||||||
|
Rottie (PitBulls dad.)
“If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons Born free taxed to death!!! |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
White Rhino
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: May 05 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 27 2008 at 8:58am |
|||||||
|
Thanks for the info Tony....
|
||||||||
|
"White Rhino"
"Everybody's got to believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer." --W. C. Fields |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Cookie Monster
Special Member
Joined: January 22 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 27 2008 at 11:27am |
|||||||
Very good point Tony! The working pressures of the 7.62x54R are comparable to the .308 Winchester and the 30-06 Springfield. Which is well above the safe working pressures of the Enfield and 7.62 NATO receivers. Also as Richard/SIA mentioned the receiver will have to be enlarged to accept the larger Russian rounds which would weaken the receiver even further. The Springfield Armory found this out in the early 1900’s when they used the same process in manufacturing receivers for the M1903. They were hardened in the same manner as the receivers for the 30-40 Krag. The Krag’s working pressure was well below the 30-06 ball ammo specs. Thus resulting in several receiver failures. And this was done by an Armory that knew what they were doing!!!!! Just think what may happen to a “Bubba” the garage gunsmith conversion? |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Lithgow
Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 27 2008 at 11:53am |
|||||||
|
Good advice Cookie
|
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Cookie Monster
Special Member
Joined: January 22 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 27 2008 at 11:59am |
|||||||
|
Thank you Lithgow! I also give credit to Dave and Tony as well. They preach the same thing. |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Lithgow
Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 27 2008 at 2:33pm |
|||||||
|
There has been much written about 308 vs 7.62mm.
They are externally the same but the shells of the Military stuff are thicker and headspace specs are different.
Pressures are also different and anybody considering interchanging the two rounds should research carefully and make an informed decision.
For my No4 conversion, I only use 7.62 ball ammo (NATO) but when I run out of that I will keep my loads down to a safe level.
I believe There is a load called managed recoil or something similar which is a lower pressure 308 cartridge.
|
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Tony
Moderator Group
Moderator Joined: April 18 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 3256 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 27 2008 at 9:35pm |
|||||||
|
I think Dave has the info for 762 nato round reloads if not he'll know a man that has the info.
go to www.Davetheoracle.com |
||||||||
|
Rottie (PitBulls dad.)
“If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons Born free taxed to death!!! |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
White Rhino
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: May 05 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 28 2008 at 7:54am |
|||||||
|
Some place I had looked at for some reloading data actualy had 7.62x51 NATO load chart.... I was in a hurry to get off the compuker so the Wife could find some thing and forgot to mark the site.. will try and keep my eyes open for it next time I look up data...
|
||||||||
|
"White Rhino"
"Everybody's got to believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer." --W. C. Fields |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Smokey
Senior Member
Joined: May 11 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 806 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: December 28 2008 at 8:52am |
|||||||
|
The Hodgon website has the following: http://data.hodgdon.com/main_menu.asp
This is a starting load for the .308 Winchester.
If you use military brass, reduce the powder charge 5%.
What you are looking for is something that comes close to a 147gr FMJBT at 2750fps, with reasonable pressure.
|
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 01 2009 at 7:19am |
|||||||
|
100 gn jacketed H322 41gns (oal 2.530)
110 gn jacketed IMR4831 =47gns H4381 =50gns H4350=47gns IMR4350=47gns (please note Imr Loads OAL =2.600 & HOD LOADS =2.530) 130GN JACKETED H350= 47GNS H4831=50GNS 2.530 MIN OAL 165GN JACKETED H4350=47GNS H4831=50GNS 2.530 MIN OAL 180GN JACKETED IMR4831=46GNS IMR4350=46GNS 2.725 MIN OAL Please note these loads are for rifles in good condition & do not exceed 40,000 CUP! They are both starting & never exceed loads !!!! But have been deemed safe in Enfield convertions These are some examples of 7.62 NATO loads . As my Learned colleagues have pointed out, Rechambering a Enfield action (unless it was a Pat 14 or 1917 ) to 7.62X 54 is akin to slamming your genitals in a car door ! Rounds like the 45-70 ,38-55 ,30-30 ,32spl,7-30 waters , even the 444,work well within the pressure perimeters! You will note that these are all rounds that are used in Lever actions where pressures are much lower Dave |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |