![]() |
Proper clocking a barrel? |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
scottz63
Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2021 Location: Mid Mo Status: Offline Points: 829 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Proper clocking a barrel?Posted: January 02 2023 at 9:04am |
|
What's the best way to properly clock a barrel on a No1 MkIII receiver? Going to be installing a barrel soon and would like to know the proper method of doing so. There are no line-up markings on either the receiver or barrel.
Thanks, Scott
|
|
|
14EH AIT Instructor-PATRIOT Fire Control Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
|
|
![]() |
|
scottz63
Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2021 Location: Mid Mo Status: Offline Points: 829 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 02 2023 at 4:03pm |
|
Also, what about lube on the barrel threads for these? I usually use a synthetic moly lube for such things.
|
|
|
14EH AIT Instructor-PATRIOT Fire Control Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
|
|
![]() |
|
Doco Overboard
Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2020 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 279 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 02 2023 at 5:56pm |
|
I use wheel bearing grease, lightly, and then level the action body to the knox form. One or more cross test vial bubble levels are helpful. Make a comparison from the top of the body rear at the bolt well, and the body underside parallel surfaces. Also have a look at the extractor cut, inside the body ring and the angled mating surface on the barrel tenon. Things are not always as they appear at this location. The two surfaces may not always be equidistant to each other so dont get hung up on that detail too much. Make sure when the barrel is hand screwed tight, it's slightly less than a 1/4 " from TDC. And the threads are not bound up/sticky before the body/knox meet, hand tightened.
|
|
![]() |
|
scottz63
Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2021 Location: Mid Mo Status: Offline Points: 829 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 02 2023 at 7:18pm |
|
Thanks! I will do just that.
|
|
|
14EH AIT Instructor-PATRIOT Fire Control Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
|
|
![]() |
|
shiloh
Senior Member
Joined: January 08 2019 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 3049 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 03 2023 at 5:07am |
|
this from the amourers and how they did it, written by Peter L |
|
![]() |
|
britrifles
Senior Member
Joined: February 03 2018 Location: Georgia, USA Status: Offline Points: 8404 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 03 2023 at 5:14am |
|
I’ve changed several barrels on the M1 and on a No. 4. I index the barrel using a spirit level across the front sight block band (remove the blade) and action body. It’s worked for me, required very little front sight adjustment.
|
|
![]() |
|
scottz63
Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2021 Location: Mid Mo Status: Offline Points: 829 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 03 2023 at 5:36am |
Wow! That's way too much for me to digest with my first cup of coffee. LOL! Thanks.
|
|
|
14EH AIT Instructor-PATRIOT Fire Control Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
|
|
![]() |
|
scottz63
Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2021 Location: Mid Mo Status: Offline Points: 829 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 03 2023 at 5:39am |
Thanks. This whole level thing looks to be the way to go with this.
|
|
|
14EH AIT Instructor-PATRIOT Fire Control Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
|
|
![]() |
|
pisco
Senior Member
Joined: November 21 2018 Location: australia Status: Offline Points: 206 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 03 2023 at 5:57pm |
|
Done quite a few don’t have any special tools it’s not rocket science
|
|
![]() |
|
scottz63
Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2021 Location: Mid Mo Status: Offline Points: 829 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 26 2023 at 5:12pm |
|
How is this? It's right at 1/4 inch at hand tight. Also, the extractor cut is close to being lined up.
Edit: Just noticed I need to touch-up the extractor cut in the barrel. A little file and polish perhaps.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
14EH AIT Instructor-PATRIOT Fire Control Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
|
|
![]() |
|
Rossfield
Groupie
Joined: June 08 2024 Location: Nova Albion Status: Offline Points: 37 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: June 16 2024 at 8:37am |
|
The No.1, aka SMLE is so hand-crafted there's no reliable flat surface I can think of: the top of the charger bridge is not a controlled surface. The bottom of the bolt way is too narrow and inaccessible. The shoulders inside the mag well should be consistent and the bottom face of the receiver might be. Probably all done by eye back in the day; there were plenty of people with good eyes around back then. If you can get a No.1 to breech evenly and tightly on both the rear face of the barrel and the rear face of the shoulder that would always be preferable IMO, but the default was the rear face of the barrel. One might ask why they bothered to put on a shoulder at all then, but the "reinforce" over the chamber had to end somewhere! ![]() Breeching washers under the shoulder were acceptable on the No.4 and a person who wanted to could make some up from shim stock if they wanted the shoulder on a No.1 to turn up tight against the front face of the receiver. That would be in a case where the barrel turned up against the inside face of receiver in about the right position for final tightening (as in the photo above), but where there was a gap between the shoulder of the barrel and the front face of the receiver. Nothing can be taken off the rear face of the barrel without altering chamber length etc. and back in ye day it was probably just "selective fitting" aka swapping parts around until you get a reasonable fit. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |