Enfield-Rifles.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Enfields > Enfield Rifles
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Enfield No4 MK1 T
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Enfield No4 MK1 T

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Enfield No4 MK1 T
    Posted: December 18 2024 at 4:55pm
Here I have a 1943 BSA Enfield T sniper for review. The rifle is parts matching however the scope and mount is a reproduction. There are no scope serial numbers on the wrist and inside the hand guards.

T marks are still present on the stock but I assume it’s a war time replacement since it’s missing the scope serial numbers? Please let me know what you think and thanks for your support!





Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 3:11am
I see a few of the expected marking of a T.  Is there a “S51” Holland and Holland marking on the underside of the butt stock?  Not having scope serial numbers on the butt stock may indicate a scope was never fitted to the rifle. If the stock had been replaced in service, the new one would have been remarked with the scope number.  

Look for the letter S stamped on the front right side action body where the “lump” for the never fitted magazine cutoff axis pin would be located. 

Artiozen has posted a very good article on how to identify a genuine No. 4 T written by Roger Payne and David Tomkinson: 



Back to Top
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 3:50am
Thank you so much for the reply!! No S-51 marks present. I do see the S on the action body. I attached a picture for above for reference. Also attached some more pictures for review. So maybe the stock is original but never fitted with a scope? Is this possible? I thought those were only the “T-Less scope” models.

Also I’m looking to buy this sniper for $2k.
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 4:43am
The D6E stamp looks right. I presume that was a unique inspectors mark for the T’s, but I’m not absolutely certain of that.

What seems odd to me is that the rifle has the H&H markings but never had a scope fitted. Payne’s article suggests there may have been BSA T’s without scopes fitted, but those did not have the T stamp on the left sidewall.  

If this is a forgery, someone seems to have replicated the typical stamps/markings. 

Can you send a photo of the underside butt stock S51 stamp and also the S on the right front action body cutoff lump, I’d like to compare them to my 1944 BSA. 

If it is a genuine T, without scope, might still be worth the $2000 if it has the reproduction mount and scope which alone is worth about $600.  Has the seller shot the rifle with the scope? 

The odd thing here too is that the scope pads had to be fitted with the bracket and scope that was to be paired with the rifle such that the scope culminated to the bore axis. The No. 32 scope did not have a lot of elevation and windage adjustment to play with.  Look very closely at the top front flat surface of the butt stock, just behind the action body butt socket. Someone may have sanded down the butt stock and removed these markings. 

Ian Skennerton mentions in two of his books, The Lee Enfield Story and The British Sniper that there were an unknown number of Holland and Holland sniper units supplied without a scope and scope mount.  These are believed to be mostly Savage built No. 4 rifles, but perhaps also BSA. They can be identified as being marked S51 on the butt and scope mount pads fitted but no telescope serial number on the butt. 


Back to Top
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 7:17am
Greetings!!

Thank you so much for all the info. I asked the seller and he can’t find any S51 stamp markings. Yes, the shooter has shot it several times to my knowledge. Do you think there are too many red flags?
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 1:12pm
If I knew it had a good barrel and shot well, I might buy it as a shooter. I’d want to be sure that scope can be zeroed at least out to 600 yards with a usable range of elevation and windage adjustment remaining. 

Reasonable chance it is legit, but without a matching genuine No. 32 scope and mount, it won’t be worth all that much compared to a complete T.   I’d think about  $1000 for the rifle and $600 for the repro scope and mount. 

Some might argue a scope-less T is worth more than a standard No. 4, perhaps true.  But it will never be a highly desirable collector No. 4 T with a repro scope and mount. 


Back to Top
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 4:28pm
Yes I’m trying to get a shooter! Is it a possible fake or do you see enough correct markings?
Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member
Avatar
Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 16997
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 4:52pm
i see the C-arrow on the muzzle end of the forearm that says it saw canadian service , the 199 in yellow paint looks like a rack number that the cadet schools used 
Back to Top
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 5:12pm
Back to Top
Honkytonk View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 30 2017
Location: Brandon Mb
Status: Offline
Points: 5190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Honkytonk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 5:19pm
It does look a little beat up... like our cadet DP rifles.
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 5:27pm
Yes, can’t be the original forend or butt stock (since the butt stock does not have the H&H S51 stamp).  Looks like may be a Savage trigger guard. 

But the TR (Telescopic Rifle) marking appears where it should on the butt socket, the T stamp on the left flat side of the action body and the D6E inspection stamp on the back face of the action body next to the opening for the bolt.  Unless these are clever forgeries, it appears to be a No. 4 Mk I (T) less scope. 

My suggestion that the value of the rifle alone might be $1000 is in recognition that the wood is not original, as well as possibly some of the metal parts. Worth even less if those scope pads and T markings are forgeries.  

There are some additional markings on the left side of the butt socket that I can’t read. 

I think in all, to me, it would be worth $1500 IF it had a good barrel and the repro scope was reasonably well culminated to the bore. I’d need evidence that it was so before I put down $1500 for it.  But, I’m a shooter of collectible rifles. For a collector, this is probably not the rifle you would want. 



Back to Top
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 5:42pm
Got it. Thank you so much man! Really pursued all the inside and help
Back to Top
Shamu View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Logo Designer / Donating Member

Joined: April 25 2007
Location: MD, USA.
Status: Offline
Points: 20510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shamu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 6:11pm
I never Saw a (T) before with a a Zamac buttplate?
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member
Avatar
Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 16997
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2024 at 7:55pm
so i read the sellers description , it is fair at best , he has provided faulty info as well as a lot of opinion but ill not quibble further but to say - that is not based off the SMLE [thatr would be a no1 rifle of earlier WW] it is based off the current WWII production no4 rifle , there is a difference , 

that handguard was 43 production but the grooves do not indicate that as they were producing both the grooved and ungrooved , just depended on which supplier that part came from , 
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 20 2024 at 12:34am
Yes,  I don’t believe this is the original wood to this barreled action. That would explain the lack of a scope serial number and H&H S51 stamp on the butt stock and the Zamak butt plate.  And perhaps that big yellow “100” rack number painted on the butt stock too. 

The action does appear to be a BSA 1943 Mk I(T) from the action body markings. But other bits have been used to build up the complete rifle. And somewhere along the line, the scope got separated with the rifle, or, it was one of the scope-less rifles completed by H&H (perhaps the less likely scenario). 

The one new thing I see on the photos provided on the guns international website is the colour of the mount pads appears way off. I’ve never seen a T with mount pads that colour.  Also, the edges of that front pad are very square looking, not rounded like the original.  It now makes me suspect the entire scope setup is repro, including the pads. 



And here is my genuine T, note the rounded edges. 



Well, it now appears as sold. If nothing else, it looks like a T, and if the claim of a very good condition action and bore is true, then perhaps it will at least be a shooter if not a collector piece.  Usable in the CMP Vintage Sniper matches.



Back to Top
mp40bran View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: December 18 2024
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mp40bran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 20 2024 at 2:03am
Thank you such much everyone for your wisdom. Wow what an excellent first experience on this board! Stay tuned as I will post a picture of my mint correct T-less!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.