SMLE Magazine Variations and Dates of Introduction |
Post Reply |
Author | |
WilliamS
Senior Member Joined: March 30 2020 Location: Camas WA USA Status: Offline Points: 329 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: November 23 2020 at 3:40pm |
Does anyone know what dates each of the magazine variants were introduced? I assume this is in the LoC but I do not have a copy of the List. A pointer to a good source for the LoC would be appreciated as well or in lieu of dates for each magazine. I have 4th Variation, 3rd from 2nd, 3rd from 1st, and hopefully soon a 2nd Variation, and a mess of early rifles to rebuild. I'd like to pair the right style magazine with the right rifle. Thanks in advance.
|
|
A square 10
Special Member Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 14452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
the bible would be your best investment - "the lee enfield story" is a hard bound by ian skennerton , a bit pricey but well worth the cost to an LE collector
second choice would be skennertons series of soft bound 'small arms identification series' , for the SMLE you want no 1 , it identifies all the bits with their various variations very well , third choice would be strattons series , these were intended as pocket references and have a vast amount of the research done presenteed in quick reference form , none of these are absolute , they are the best we have to date , there have been reviseed notations over the years of the internet collecting experience but by no means diminishing any of these they are what we have these days till someone takes on the task of improving on them ,
|
|
WilliamS
Senior Member Joined: March 30 2020 Location: Camas WA USA Status: Offline Points: 329 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks! I actually have all three of those, and although I had missed it on the first pass through, I was able to find the date for the No2 Case which is linked to the MkI* upgrade (March 27 1906). The No3 and No4 case are given as introduced with the 1910 change to MkVII ammunition, but unfortunately I can't find any definitive information as to when that was actually implemented. Circumstantial evidence and replies I've gotten on other boards indicate that there are British-made rifles that were sighted for MkVI ammunition as late as 1913, which would have to have No2 cases, and still no idea when the No4 case actually entered production. I would suspect that if No2 cases were still needed as late as 1913 that most if not all of the MkVII sighted rifles to that point had No3 cases - but I have no solid evidence one way or another. The actual approval of the rifle changes to match the MkVII ammunition wasn't given until October 1 1911, it looks like.
|
|
Bear43
Special Member Donating Member Joined: August 11 2010 Location: Doland, SD Status: Offline Points: 3059 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You always see a mix of things from the time of approval of change to actual implementation. A prime example is just the Mk III to Mk III* changeover. Some manufacturers changed earlier and some later so even though the Mk III* change was approved in 1915 you see them manufactured into 1916 as they used up stocks of parts. It's never a definitive change-over at x date. Makes it interesting and a bit confusing at times.
|
|
The Armourer
Senior Member Joined: June 23 2019 Location: Y Felinhelli Status: Offline Points: 1246 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Two very similar words with very different meanings, both commonly used when talking about Lee Enfield changes'. Obsolete. Meaning it is immediately obsolete and use of it should stop. Disposed off. Obsolesence Meaning it stayed in service but if it continued to work it stayed in use until it broke. At that point it would be scrapped or disposed of. The Mk3 / Mk3* was a progressive implentation of the 'new' features and there was no specific cut-off date for their introduction. Some or all of the Mk3 features could be found on Mk3* for many years - probably until the manufacturer had to replace their tooling. For example, the windage rear sight on the Mk3 would remain in use until the rifle went into the Armourers workshop (for some reason) and it would then have the rear sight pinned. It would no go into the workshop simply because the rear sight needed pinning. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |