Refinishing the wood. |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Zed
Special Member Donating Member Joined: May 01 2012 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 5585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: August 24 2020 at 11:48am |
I've been wanting to remove the shiny varnish on my L39 stock since I bought it.
I finally found the time to remove the crap and treat the stripped wood with linseed oil. The fore end is beech and the butt is walnut, which is why they had stained and varnished it previously. I prefer to put it back to original specification. I have used "Clarified Linseed oil". It is what Artist's use for mixing with oil paint. It's lighter in colour than the standard raw or boiled oil. So doesn't darken the wood as much. Here's some photos. |
|
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
Shamu
Admin Group Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 17603 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Very nicely done! I think that "Clarified Linseed oil" is whats referred to as "Stand Oil" here? "What are the differences between linseed oil and stand oil? How do these
differences affect the properties of paint? The key differences are the
result of two important physical properties of drying oils: the degree
of polymerization and the acid value of the oil. These two properties
are affected by the treatment of oil—typically using heat—that changes
one or both of them. Heat treatment of oil makes what is called "bodied"
oil, which is the more accurate term for what many call "stand oil." |
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
Zed
Special Member Donating Member Joined: May 01 2012 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 5585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The clarified oil is more expensive than boiled linseed oil. But you use so little that it's worthg it on the blonder wood in my opinion. It does dry nicely too. I did my "Resistance" No4 with raw linseed oil; it tends to sweat a bit of oil when it gets hot.
|
|
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
Shamu
Admin Group Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 17603 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yeah the artists oils tend to not have the additives of the commercial stuff.
|
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
The Armourer
Senior Member Joined: June 23 2019 Location: Y Felinhelli Status: Offline Points: 1246 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Nicely done. That looks much nearer the colours of the L39's I've seen.
|
|
Zed
Special Member Donating Member Joined: May 01 2012 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 5585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
thanks!
I'm pleased with the result; much better than high gloss. I treated the inside as well to ensure it's properly protected; it was looking a bit dry. The fore end has a modification at the main screw. A metal plate around 3/32" thick sits in a groove around the main screw area and the trigger guard presses on it to spread the load on the wood. However there is no spacer fitted. I understand the idea of spreading the load accros a larger area of wood; but not sure if the lack of spacer is a good idea. anyone else seen these type of modifications?
|
|
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
The Armourer
Senior Member Joined: June 23 2019 Location: Y Felinhelli Status: Offline Points: 1246 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Some / many / most of the L36 and L42 forends were 'badly made' and were so thin they were prone to splitting, so the 'plate' became an official 'bodge'. Peter Laidler has commented about them on a number of occasions where the remedy was to chisel to wood out and insert a new piece of the correct height, Some fore-ends have been found to be too low at the reinforce bearing
and there’s no way of checking these before you start! Many came to light
during the L42 programme and ….., I’m going off the subject, but just remember
the ‘plate, reinforce’ saga! If your is low, then the only answer is to chisel
it out and insert a hardwood insert….. or start again or just commit
suicide………. The same applies to warped fore-ends I’m afraid and while I’ve come
across a few, they were inevitably scrap This may be of interest : I was having a browse
through the Small Arms Committee minutes relating to the L39A1 rifle the other
day and found some bits and pieces that I think I ought to pass on. Including
some things that I never realized either!
The first bit is that contrary to what I firmly believed, that the rifles were built up to new rifle specification from ‘new’ components (including new barrels obviously) including bodies but the committee minutes state ‘….rifles converted from the Rifle No4 Mk1/2 and 2’ too. I was under the impression from the Armourers technical blurb that all L39’s were made ‘as new’. But this is clearly not so because Mk1/2 type L39’s will exist. This COULD mean that L39’s were made from brand new, unused ex c.1955 Fazakerley bodies. It could also include USED ex .303” Mk2 bodies. It could also Mk2/1 rifles unbreeched and rebarrelled at the point of conversion to L39 at Enfield and it COULD include bodies converted to Mk1/2 but UNUSED since conversion at Fazakerley in the late 40’s to mid 50’s. However, no mention is made of Mk1/3 bodies. Paragraph 3 of the build standard states that the rifles will be fitted with the stock butt of the No4 rifle, ‘….identical except that a small recess is machined under the knuckle to hold spare foresight blades in a suitable container. There you have it. The correct, ‘as-issue’ butt is that of the No4, modified as detailed above. But (if you’ll excuse the pun), more later….! Para 8 of the build standard also states that the magazine will be the standard .303” magazine that will be used as a loading platform. It goes on to state that the rifle may be fitted with a 10 round 7.62mm magazine at the users request Now here’s a surprise…….. Para 20 states that certain rifles are fitted with a special factory size 00 bolt head. ‘……..at the factory only, it is used when assembly tolerances require a smaller head than a ‘0’. The bolt head is special and is not provisioned as a spare’. There’s a thing to get your know-it-all mates coughing into their beer! Instruction 1 to the committee says that the first 50 EX type rifles (or should this be XL rifles?) were produced and procured with trigger pressures set to the SERVICE limits of 1st - 3 to 4 lbs and 2nd – 5 to 6.5 lbs. But subsequent series production is to be set at 1st - 2.5 to 3.5 lbs and 2nd – 4 to 5.5lbs pull. To cater for this permissible adjustment, the face of the sear can be adjusted to a maximum angle of 80 degrees ( to decrease the sear load pressure). Additionally, magazine catches with an additional sear spring location recess BELOW the original will be provided or may be encountered. There, that’s the answer if you have one on yours! Now, in conjunction with the civilian target shooting world and the Army Rifle Association, the Light Weapon Defect and Modification Committee has agreed that build standard of the L39 rifle may be altered to include the following: A commercial SLING SWIVEL can be fitted in place of the front trigger guard screw A commercial STOCK FORE-END can be fitted using commercially or UK Military recognized practice to ensure the correct bedding and assembly of the barrel and body STOCK BUTT can be replaced with the service No5, No8, No4 variants and a commercial ‘monte-carlo type with suitable face pieces (I think they mean cheek rests…..) dependent on the competitors competitive situation (type of competition rules ?) TUNNEL FORESIGHTS of the PH FS-22A or any similar trade pattern WITH THE CORRECT DOVETAIL ARRANGEMENT. Can be used. REARSIGHT: Any make of sight, similar to the PH 5C or AJP 4/47 which can be readily adapted can be used providing that it does so without resorting to any alteration of any kind to the rifle. The inspection of any altered or modified L39 rifle will be undertaken by the periodic REME Armourers inspection which we still call the PRE. They will take into account the competitive nature of the weapon and their inspection will concern only the safety and mechanical condition. Any weapon that includes any deviation from the build standard will be returned to that standard prior to disposal or return to Ordnance. Well, there it is! What is quite interesting is the fact that no sights are fitted to this weapon according to the build sheet standard, not even a standard backsight! Even to the point that Field and Base workshops required to test them for accuracy were to have available a PH5C sight in order to do so (using the authority of the SA Committee to purchase one!). The report also states that no government stores are to be used outside the build sheet standard. So this means that even if you just wanted to use a standard No4 Mk1 type (or an L42 metric version) backsight, you weren’t allowed. But I don’t expect anyone ever abided by those rules. There, another few useless bits of Lee Enfield knowledge that you didn’t know about. |
|
Zed
Special Member Donating Member Joined: May 01 2012 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 5585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Armourer; many thanks! That is excellent info and answers a few questions and confirms one or two things I've found on my rifle.
The cocking piece angle is 10° off the right angle; as opposed to 4° on the standard No4 rifle. I suspected it was standard, but was not sure. This is very useful info if you need to reduce the trigger pull weight. I have altered the angle to 6° on both my No4's that we use in Service rifle competitions. It improves the pull weight slightly but remains well within the competition limits. Obviously the most important thing to check when modifying this angle is that the sear will return to it's normal position on the cocking piece if releasing the trigger from first pull instead of continuing with the shot. I have the No4 Butt with the capsule for the front sight inserts, however the front sight must have been replaced as it's larger diameter than the stored inserts 17mm instead of 15mm. So I have a set inserts I can't use in 15mm. But have a new set of 17mm ones that can't be stored in the rifle. The cheek piece is not standard for L39 but is No4T type (copy?) , fitted prior to my ownership. 10 round mag is fitted to this one.
|
|
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
A square 10
Special Member Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 14452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
nice job matching that furniture , looks great
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |