![]() |
Inspectors Bolt Gauge for ShtLE |
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
englishman_ca
Senior Member
Joined: September 08 2009 Location: Almaguin Status: Offline Points: 1094 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: April 11 2020 at 3:41pm |
|
Remember, the old non standard engineering specs were a standard at one time, for somebody.
At the time that Enfield was getting into tooling for mass production (circa 1856) and needed standardisation, there was no universal standard of measurement so they stuck a stick in the sand and established their own. The Imperial inch standard came later. A difference of 0.0004 inches, I believe. It caused all kinds of initial problems with tolerance stacking for Lithgow. Some of the strange thread pitches might seem bizzare to some these days. Why a thread pitch of 26-1/3 per inch?? Simple answer actually, the change gears for thread cutting on the lathes just worked out that way and was actually an easy gear change to do on that equipment. Most modern machinery does not have these screw cutting gear ratios and combinations, they have different sized gears. The Enfield thread form is a little different in angle and has rounded crests and valleys. But cutting tools can be made, little problem. Enfield thread forms work well and are robust. So back in 1856 a screw 0.181 inch in diameter and 26-1/3 thread pitch was straight forward to make, where as a modern common Unified threaded screw might have been a challenge with special tooling needed. One thing that I don't have is a set of Enfield thread taps and dies. If somebody ever had some made, I am sure that they would sell well.
|
|
|
.
. Look to your front, mark your target when it comes! |
|
![]() |
|
pisco
Senior Member
Joined: November 21 2018 Location: australia Status: Offline Points: 206 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 12 2020 at 2:24am |
|
a set of taps and dies would be handy
|
|
![]() |
|
Zed
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: May 01 2012 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6460 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 12 2020 at 11:44am |
|
When I replaced the bolt body for the No1MkIII*. The new bolt body was 0.006" six thousandths of an inch longer than the original when fitted. Measured with the same bolt head. Head space was on the field gauge limit (0.074") with the original bolt and now is around 0.068". However to fit the new bolt, it required very careful stoning on one lug to get equal contact on both. I used jeweller's Arkansas stone to adjust the lug. Probably only 1 or 2 thou removed to get the fit.
If you want to use the new bolt as a test; test the lug contact when you check the headspace. You may need a few thou' of that head space to get the lug fit adjusted. |
|
|
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
![]() |
|
Shamu
Admin Group
Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 20510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 12 2020 at 1:27pm |
|
Weren't most of them BA? Check out Brit old car collectors sites they used BA a lot IIRC. MG comes to mind specifically. These guys in Oz?
|
|
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
![]() |
|
The Armourer
Senior Member
Joined: June 23 2019 Location: Y Felinhelli Status: Offline Points: 1246 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: May 12 2020 at 2:40pm |
The number 4 rifles were (primarily) BA threads but the No1 MK3 were weird Enfield inch 'specials' Example - Ejector screw on the No4 is 3BA, whilst on the No1 Mk3 it is 0.1656" x 37 TPI |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |