N140 Loads with 174 gr SMK
Printed From: Enfield-Rifles.com
Category: Reloading
Forum Name: Reloading .303 British
Forum Description: Enfield-Rifles.com accepts NO responsibility for any loads that may be used by persons reading this forum. USE CAUTION WHEN TRYING ANY NEW LOADS!!! ANY DATA DEEMED UNSAFE WILL BE REMOVED!!!
URL: http://www.enfield-rifles.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=14070
Printed Date: March 26 2026 at 3:31pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: N140 Loads with 174 gr SMK
Posted By: britrifles
Subject: N140 Loads with 174 gr SMK
Date Posted: July 11 2025 at 1:08pm
|
My supply of Varget is dwindling down, so I’m in search of another match load. I’ve got lots of N140 so chose that to work with.
I’m shooting these loads out of the No.4 T that I just rebarrelled with a Lothar Walther 4 groove RH twist barrel. Now at 155 total rounds after these tests.
Basic Load Data:
PPU Case Annealed and Neck Sized WLR Primer VV N140, 40.0, 40.5, 41.0, and 41.5 gr. 174 gr Sierra MatchKing 3.070” OAL
It was evident after the first group of 40.0 gr N140 that I would not shoot the 41.0 and 41.5 loads as velocities were higher than I expected. Also, the 40.5 gr N140 load, the group blew out.
Data is for 10 shot groups fired at 600 yards off the bench.
Also showing is the control group, my standard Varget Match Load.
MV = Mean Velocity ES = Extreme Spread SD= Standard Deviation
I’m going to drop the N140 loads back and try 39.0 and 39.5 gr. Would like to get the velocities about the same as my Varget load, that way the rifle will regulate to the No. 32 scope elevation settings and accuracy will probably be very good as well. N140 is a slightly slower burning powder and giving higher velocities than Varget at the same charge weight.
I’ll provide an update here on the results of 39.0 and 39.5 gr.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 11 2025 at 1:46pm
|
Geoff,
I think I've mentioned on here before that 41.8grs of N140 has a long held belief here in the UK that it replicates the MkVII load of 2440fps ?? I wonder if that is popular (UK) shooting myth, or are your results possibly temperature related?
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 11 2025 at 2:13pm
|
Good question Mick.
I neglected to give the weather conditions. It was not all that hot, 85 deg F at the time of shooting the N140 loads. N140 is supposed to be quite temperature stable.
Vihtavuori website gives the following for N140 with 174 SMK seated to 3.070”:
Min 38.4 gr at 2379 fps Max 41.7 gr at 2566 fps
Based on my tests, I suspect that is about right.
I’m rather suspect of the claim that 41.8 gr duplicates Mk 7 ball muzzle velocities. Or, Vihtavuori has changed their powder formulation since then. I’m thinking it’s more like 39.8 gr.
|
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 11 2025 at 2:22pm
|
Food for thought Geoff! I wonder if I need to re-look at my loads which did at the time include a 900 yard shoot which I am now (slowly) experimenting with a 190gr bullet and N150.
The forecast for tomorrows shoot at Bisley is 93f, assuming I manage to shoot my three details in that heat!
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 11 2025 at 3:49pm
|
93 deg F in the UK??
That’s 10 deg hotter than the forecast for NE Georgia tomorrow. But it’s the 70-80% RH for tomorrow’s match that I’m more worried about.
Shooting a 80 round Service Rifle match, four stages of 20 rounds each + 2 sighter shots per stage.
|
Posted By: Sapper740
Date Posted: July 12 2025 at 2:57am
britrifles wrote:
N140 is supposed to be quite temperature stable. |
Geoff, I've had this temperature stability chart saved on my hard drive which shows the expected velocity gain per degree rise in temperature. Unfortunately the baseline isn't shown nor the low and high temps that the chart can be expected to be reliable but it is useful as a tool to know which powders are the least affected by heat. I have no idea who developed this chart nor can I speak to its accuracy.
|
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 12 2025 at 8:17am
britrifles wrote:
93 deg F in the UK?? |
Geoff we're in the middle of a heat wave after the wettest winter I can recall; drove back from Bisley today and the car recorded 32.5c or 90.5f in old money as call it over here.
Hot weather is not conducive to good shooting!
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: Sapper740
Date Posted: July 12 2025 at 9:13am
Strangely Brown wrote:
britrifles wrote:
93 deg F in the UK?? |
Geoff we're in the middle of a heat wave after the wettest winter I can recall; drove back from Bisley today and the car recorded 32.5c or 90.5f in old money as call it over here.
Hot weather is not conducive to good shooting! |
We're having a bit of a cool down here in Texas Mick, it's only going to be 93 f. today. ;>) The only way we can shoot on a really hot day when it's north of 100 is shoot in the shade and have large fans blowing.
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 13 2025 at 12:53pm
|
Thanks Derek, I’ve seen that table before, but not sure where. 0.4 fps per deg F is quite good (stable). That suggests only a very small increase shooting at 85 deg F vs 70 deg F (6 fps).
I’ve done my own tests with Varget, and found it very stable, as others have. I’ve not noticed any appreciable change in MV with Varget from 40 deg to 85 deg F which encompasses about 80% of the conditions I shoot in.
Speaking of heat, I shot in a match yesterday, as did Mick on the other side of the pond, and it was miserable on both sides! By the time of the last stage of the match at 600 yards in slow fire prone it was around 1230 with full sun right above us. We had just had a light shower and that sun drove the humidity up to around 80% RH.
Yesterday I was shooting a 80 shot Service Rifle Match with the AR. My 600 yd stage load is 23.5 gr N140 with the 80 gr SMK. I did not see any change in elevation setting from my last match when it was quite a bit cooler.
From winter to summer, I’ve not detected more than 1/2 MOA difference at 600 yards with N140 from 40 to 85 deg F. I get much more change in elevation (and measured velocity) after I clean the bore with JB and completely remove the carbon ring that builds up right in front of the case, as much as 100 fps difference.
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 14 2025 at 11:31am
|
I've done some poking around on the net and did find out that the previous formulation of N140 was not all that temp stable, more like 1.4 fps/deg F vs 0.4 that is shown on the table that Derek (Sapper) posted. But, the newer formulation with the decoppering agent is supposedly much more temp stable.
I think I have the newer formulation, I will check when I get home tonight.
Next step is to test 38.5, 39.0 and 39.5 and that will complete the range of loads from 38.5 to 40.5 gr at which I should be able to interpolate on 2370-2400 MV that I'm looking for; providing it also gives good accuracy at 600 yds.
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 14 2025 at 11:32am
New load tables incoming I hope!
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 14 2025 at 11:43am
|
I now wonder if the VihtaVuori formulation change also resulted in a change in the load data. My results (so far) seem to agree with the load data that VV currently has on-line with a MAX charge of 41.7 gr at a muzzle velocity of 2566 fps.
I rarely ever go back to the hardcopy book data, unless I know that the power I have is from that time period; otherwise I pull up the current data from the power manufacturer.
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 14 2025 at 3:25pm
Good move
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 14 2025 at 3:53pm
|
I checked the jug of N140 I have opened, it is the more recent formulation with the decoppering agent and “temperature-stable” statement.
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 15 2025 at 9:29am
That's good news!
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 18 2025 at 3:36pm
|
Got out to the range today to finish with the N140 loads in the No. 4 T.
Wx was warm and humid again today, similar to last weeks tests (40.0 and 40.5 gr N140). Getting tired of this, looking forward to fall. Winds were switchy today, so shot these at 300 yds, last weeks were at 600 yds.
Again, basic load data is:
PPU Case neck sized WLR Primer Vihtavuori N140 Powder, all charges weighed 174 gr Sierra MatchKing 3.07” Cartridge Overall Length
These are all 10 shot groups fired off the bench. Garmin XERO Chrono. Group size is center to center extreme spread in minutes of angle. Temp: 85 deg F.
To duplicate Mk VII velocity specification (2440 fps), 40.3 to 40.4 gr N140 with 174 SMK
To duplicate my 40.3 gr Varget Match Load, 39.2 to 39.3 gr N140.
Velocity spreads today were larger than last weeks loads, this may indicate that spreads tighten up with N140 at the higher velocities.
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 18 2025 at 3:53pm
|
I'm supposedly "off to the range" tomorrow. Fingers crossed. A new store is opening near where in our closest "big town" Easton, Md, down here in the flatlands of the Eastern Shore. It will be only one of two in the entire area with reloading supplies. 
Not just yet, we drove past today doing other things & its Under Construction where they're re fronting an existing store. They're claiming a "soft open" this month & a "Grand Opening" in August. https://www.mymollys.com/pages/mollys-easton" rel="nofollow - https://www.mymollys.com/pages/mollys-easton
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: Sapper740
Date Posted: July 19 2025 at 4:19am
|
Always good to hear a new gun store is opening up near one of our members Shamu especially when you consider the efforts the Dems made in Blue cities to inhibit/prohibit gun stores. My hip replacement is getting very close to being healed enough that I can resume shooting again although prone might be a problem.
|
Posted By: Zed
Date Posted: July 19 2025 at 4:31am
|
That looks like good news Shamu. Last weekend I visited a family owned gun shop in Dreux ( France ), it's been there since 1920. Father to son. It has so much stock, plus very helpful service. I hope to get the chance to visit a gun shop and shooting range during my visit to the USA next month. It will be interesting to compare with the European market.
------------- It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 19 2025 at 4:53am
britrifles wrote:
To duplicate Mk VII velocity specification (2440 fps), 40.3 to 40.4 gr N140 with 174 SMK |
This is interesting Geoff and a lesson in having to rethink historical data, some 30 years ago it was accepted here that it required 41.8grs on N140 to replicate the MkVII rounds ballistic capabilities.
Either N140 has got hotter or the chrono's have become more accurate over the years, or possibly a case of both? I will now have to rethink my loading data...no bad thing given the cost of propellant!
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 19 2025 at 11:46am
|
Zed: check your PM's! 
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: Sapper740
Date Posted: July 19 2025 at 12:55pm
Strangely Brown wrote:
[QUOTE=britrifles]Either N140 has got hotter or the chrono's have become more accurate over the years, or possibly a case of both? |
You raise a valid point SB regarding chrono's possibly becoming more accurate over the years. I have an Oehler which I've owned for years and a recently purchased Garmin Xero. I was interested in doing a side-by-side comparison to see if there was a difference of any significance between the two and found two small differences: The Garmin recorded slightly higher velocities which is no surprise as the Garmin is recording actual muzzle velocity whereas the sky screens on the Oehler are recording velocities 10 to 12 feet down range but there was one interesting difference: the Oehler reported a slightly higher extreme spread than the Garmin. I put that down to differing light levels as clouds scudded overhead affecting when the glint of the bullet was picked up. Are the readings off enough to make a difference in the real world? Probably not as the average velocity readings were only 4 fps different and the ES was only 3 fps higher with the Oehler. One last point, the Garmin is many times easier to set up and use than the Oehler which now sits unused in my shop.
|
Posted By: A square 10
Date Posted: July 19 2025 at 4:47pm
|
im voting good news to start - leyt them prove me wrong , gotta be optimistic
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 3:37am
|
With my Shooting Chrony Alpha Master, I would sometimes get 150 fps difference with the sky screens on or off. In some lighting conditions, I would get a large velocity change from a previous test. I returned it and they sent me a new one but I never totally trusted it.
These little Garmin chrono's have really made collecting velocity data easy. Don't leave home without it.
|
Posted By: Zed
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 3:57am
|
Geoff, are you allowed to use the Garmin chronograph during a competition, to record your data?
------------- It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 4:35am
|
Good question Shaun, I believe the answer is yes.
I've been meaning to use mine during the sniper match to keep from making scope elevation adjustments from a high or low velocity shot (error chase); and in that way, it seems it would be contrary to the spirit of the rules.
There is a rule about no electronic devices that make noise that other shooters can hear. We have had some debate about use of small portable fans (keeps the shooting glasses from fogging over) because of "altering environmental conditions" but there is no such rule that I can find. I've seen both fans and Garmin chrono's on the line at a match.
|
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 5:40am
|
Shaun's post got me thinking what we're allowed over here. Looking at the current rules I would say Garmin's are allowed at Bisley but I've never actually seen one being used in a competition. Electronic Devices
309 Cellular or mobile telephones, or similar devices, may not at any time
be used on or in the vicinity of the firing point, unless their communication
functions are disabled eg by placing in ‘flight mode’. Personal electronic
devices may be taken to the firing point, provided they are NOT able to receive
wireless transmissions. Hardware or software for shot or score recording or
assisting with the process of the competition is forbidden, unless issued or
explicitly permitted by the competition organisers. Electronic equipment
provided by the organisers, or explicitly permitted by them, for the purposes
of electronic targetry or spectator information systems are permitted. Where
wireless personal devices are explicitly permitted for the receipt and display
of electronic target information, the screens of such devices are liable to view
by the Register Keeper or a Range Officer on demand and at any time. The
wearing of implanted medical devices or hearing aids in everyday use is not
prevented by this rule.
The only means of communication between the butts and the firing point will
be that formally used by the Range and Butt Officers. While firing is actually
taking place no person in the butts is permitted to use any other means of
communication that could be contacted by any person in sight of the firing
point.
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 10:53am
|
How about things like anemometer hygrometer or combination units with wind-speed rH & temp?
Nothing RF generating just pen & pencil.
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 11:14am
|
CMP Rules allow the use of wind meters/indicators (either mechanical or electronic), but only behind the firing line. A combo unit that would measure windspeed, temp and humidity is also allowed.
I've occasionally seen shooters pull out a wind meter. Also, many service/match rifle shooters will use a spotting scope to read the mirage (at about mid range to the target). I've never been successful at doing this so I watch the flags closest to the firing line (typically); for example, I'll watch the 200 yd flag when shooting at 600 yds. The wind has to be pretty strong and full value to make much difference at 200x, in those cases I might dial in a minute correction.
|
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 11:54am
britrifles wrote:
CMP Rules allow the use of wind meters/indicators (either mechanical or electronic), but only behind the firing line. |
Same over Geoff but you only ever see tactical shooters use them; most of us usually work off a printed card.
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 12:38pm
|
I've actually attached a 3' length of tree marking tape to the wrist strap. I use it to get a true wind angle with the meter. Mostly I use it for background information for my logbooks.
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
Posted By: Zed
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 12:56pm
SB, I think the line: " Hardware or software for shot or score recording or assisting with the process of the competition is forbidden."
May give rise to possible complaints from shooters who aren't equiped with the Garmin Chrono. I France we are not allowed portable phones or ear phones of any sort that can receive message on the firing line.
------------- It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
Posted By: Strangely Brown
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 1:34pm
Zed wrote:
I France we are not allowed portable phones or ear phones of any sort that can receive message on the firing line. |
Ironically we had an incident during the winter months when some new people to service rifle events were marking in the butts and phoned their mate on the firing point to tell him all his shots were going left!
I believe those involved have been told to either read the rules or find another discipline to shoot!
------------- Mick
|
Posted By: britrifles
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 2:41pm
|
Yup, no phones, headsets, ear defenders with audio capability are allowed in CMP Matches, for this very reason. If you have your cell phone on you, you are supposed to put in airplane mode, tho I’ve never seen anyone do this. We use our phones for taking photos too.
|
Posted By: Shamu
Date Posted: July 21 2025 at 3:56pm
That would ban my Howard Lehigts then.
------------- Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|