Print Page | Close Window

1907 Bayonet

Printed From: Enfield-Rifles.com
Category: Enfields
Forum Name: Enfield Bayonets
Forum Description: General discussion about bayonets for the Enfield rifles
URL: http://www.enfield-rifles.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5355
Printed Date: March 26 2026 at 7:18pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: 1907 Bayonet
Posted By: BlackAck
Subject: 1907 Bayonet
Date Posted: July 26 2012 at 9:48pm
My Enfield looked naked, so I went out an bought this on ebay:



She's a P-1907 made by Wilkinson Sword.  I am told the almond-shaped protrusion (not visible in this particular photo) on the scabbard is indicative of WW1-vintage.  True? It fits my No. 1 perfectly, and I do not regret the purchase. 

My only question, is there a green painted hue on the scabbard? If so, was it common to paint them?



Replies:
Posted By: Cookie Monster
Date Posted: July 27 2012 at 7:32am
You bad boy, good looking bayonet !


Posted By: A square 10
Date Posted: July 30 2012 at 4:36am
very nice , and yes the almond shaped stud on your scabbord makes it the earlier version , congrats


Posted By: Cookie Monster
Date Posted: July 30 2012 at 4:53am
Those bayonet models almost could be considered a sword? LOL


Posted By: BlackAck
Date Posted: July 30 2012 at 6:50am
I will say that the picture did not do it justice size wise.  I opened the box and was like

"&*()^%V! It's big!"

If it is of WW1 vintage, what about the green paint?  Also of WW1 vintage?


Posted By: Zed
Date Posted: July 31 2012 at 4:14am
It looks like it's in good condition, nice find. How about a picture of it attached to the rifle.

-------------
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!


Posted By: Cookie Monster
Date Posted: July 31 2012 at 5:16am
Originally posted by Zed Zed wrote:

It looks like it's in good condition, nice find. How about a picture of it attached to the rifle.
 
I concur


Posted By: BlackAck
Date Posted: July 31 2012 at 8:16pm
I am on business for the next two weeks, so the pic will be posted as soon as I am able.


Posted By: Cookie Monster
Date Posted: August 01 2012 at 12:23am
Originally posted by BlackAck BlackAck wrote:

I am on business for the next two weeks, so the pic will be posted as soon as I am able.
 
Roger that


Posted By: A square 10
Date Posted: August 06 2012 at 4:38am
looking forward to that , be looking for a frog next ????
 
OH , need to add that the clearing hole in the pommel makes the bayo a bit later version , if you look closely at the blade at the junction with the cross piece it should indicate it a crown /over/1907 , and below that a digit for month - left and 'double digit for year of mfgr - right , below that should be the mfgr name .....opposite side will have bending test "X" , inspector marks , and a broad arrow acceptance mark


Posted By: BlackAck
Date Posted: August 06 2012 at 12:02pm
I'll check the markings when I get home. Even if the bayonet is generic, it looks spot on. I actually like the idea of a mismatch. Seems more plausible somehow. I can just imagine a CQMS handing it out "rifle; one. Bayonet; one"......


Posted By: A square 10
Date Posted: August 07 2012 at 8:33am
true that would be issue proceedure but sos-ya-know , i think your bayo to be a perfectly respectable example of Pattern 1907 manufacture , wilkinson made a whole bunch of these , i think you did very well with yours and would be proud to own it , congrats
 
it happens that i have a mole , an EFD [enfeild] , a chapman , and a lithgow representing the P07s in my collection , but i would have been most pleased to have found a wilkinson back when i was looking , i collected an example of the hookie , an early and a later without the hook , then i had to date match one to my mint '42 dispersal - thus that lithgow , it was all just luck of what i found and to be honest if i found a brit made '42 dated P07 i would part with my lithgow ......the others im pleased with
 


Posted By: BlackAck
Date Posted: August 23 2012 at 11:47am


Here are the details.  Worn smooth.  I'd like to say it's 10/18 but who knows? 



And the back.  Worn smooth too. 


Posted By: John Sukey
Date Posted: August 25 2012 at 5:02am
Originally posted by Cookie Monster Cookie Monster wrote:

Those bayonet models almost could be considered a sword? LOL
Until quite late the command waqs "fix swords' Not fix bayonets


Posted By: Sarge
Date Posted: April 20 2013 at 6:07am
Ayup BlackAck,
 
A couple of points, first the scabbard.
 
During WW2, the British Home Guard had a tendancy to paint everything either Green, or Brown. you'll see this with the SMLE also...where they have painted the rifles metalwork.
 
Now you bayonet.
The clearance hole in the pommel of the '07' was ordered to be a procedure during manufacture from mid 1916.
 
The example you show is indeed a late war manufacture of 10-18 = October 1918. The two ways in which the Wilkinson Sword Company stamped their items during WW1 were as follows:- Wilkinson, and Wilkinson Pall Mall. For WW2, the stamping was changed to an abreviation, and included the area coding for that compamy = S294 WSC.
 
 


-------------
This is MY rifle, there are many like, but this one... is MINE!



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net